Wednesday, October 31, 2012

The Score So Far

One and a Half Weeks In: 

I have to preface this by saying that I was really, really nervous about the surgery rotation, for a few reasons.  The main reason is that I am not a morning person, I hate getting up at unreasonable hours (and for me, anything before 8 am is unreasonable), I am always late to everything, I am naturally a diehard night-owl, and I do not function well on little-to-no sleep.  Granted, I do it all the time, but I rarely feel like I am functioning well.  Anyway, needless to say, all those factors taken together made me very afraid that I was a) probably going to be the worst surgery student of all time and b) certainly going to be totally and completely miserable on the rotation.

The uniform.

I was also nervous because I hate feeling inept, and even though I feel that way every single day in medical school, I figured that feeling would be intensified on surgery (and this has actually turned out to be more or less true.)

New fall shoes! :)

Other reasons I was nervous include some of the questions mentioned in my previous post (and, full disclosure: the last question/concern was actually mine).  I was feeling really bummed that my heretofore somewhat-respectably-consistent exercise routine would be over forever, and that my much-healthier eating as of late would be out the window also.  

However, I am very happy to say that so far, none of my fears have been realized.  (Major caveat: I am starting out on my specialty surgery half of the rotation, and I am on the plastics service... they are notorious for having amazing hours - read: only somewhat longer than regular working hours, as opposed to inhuman hours - and they are also just a very laid-back and fun service to be on in general.  In other words, THIS COULD/WILL ALL CHANGE when I go to general surgery next.)  

In terms of getting exercise, I have actually made it FitWit most nights so far, and squeezed in a run one night when I couldn't go!
[winner: me]

Haters gonna hate.

How about eating healthy?  For the most part, I think I have done fairly well.  Eggs for breakfast!  Salads for lunch!  Apples for snacks!  Boo-ya!  Today was actually the first time in over two months that I have not packed my own lunch for work.  Pretty good streak, right??  But it might be over, sadly... I have no more groceries at home.  And today I had not one, but two Cliff Bars.  And a burrito.  And a beer.  And lots of Halloween candy.  Soooo... let's call it a wash.

Social life?  Haha... ok, this one has been sort of legitimately sucky.  Thank God I live with people I like talking to, because I have pretty much only seen them.  And I have only seen them a handful of brief times.
[winner: surgery]

But!  On plastics, you basically have weekends off (shhh, don't tell the other surgery students!), so this past weekend, I was able to drive up to Chattanooga to visit my great uncle John along with my mom, aunt Jane, and brother Martin.  Beautiful chilly fall weather, gorgeous leaves, lots of good food, plus seeing my great-grandparents' old home for the first time in probably 17 years...
[winner: me]

Great Uncle John, Aunt Jane, Mom, Martin, yours truly

And of course, there have been some holiday celebrations... that have consisted mainly of making Izzy wear this awesomely adorable costume (hey, it's my first Halloween with a dog!  I couldn't help myself.)  The roommates and I also carved jack-o-lanterns last night, which I haven't done in years.  It was a lot more work than I remembered!  But so fun.  And we also roasted the seeds... yummmm.  It also took a really long time, and so I didn't study at all and I went to bed really late, which made today sorta rough.
[winner: me, I think]

Izzy the WonderDog!

(She doesn't love wearing costumes.)

Also, on a somewhat surprising note, I have found that I am kind of loving surgery.  Like, a lot.  So all in all?  I'd say, so far... I'm still coming out ahead.  :)

Monday, October 22, 2012

Surgery Has Started....

Today, in orientation...

Clerkship director, MD: "So let me just take a few moments to address some of your fears about this rotation."

[Student concern.]

"You are worried about getting enough sleep.... You'll be fine.  You'll be really tired, that's just the way it is.  But you will be fine."

[Student concern.]

"You don't think you will be able to study enough and learn all there is to know?  Ha.  Yeah, you won't.  Don't even try."

[Student concern.]

"Your knowledge of anatomy is rusty?  Um, yeah, none of you know anatomy.  Don't worry, we expect that."

[Student concern.]

"Getting enough exercise and eating healthy??  Oh, forget it!"  [Laughs hysterically.]  [Recovers a little.]  "Seriously, though, take the stairs."  [More laughter.]


Monday, October 15, 2012

Everything Possible?



During my nursery week on my pediatrics rotation, I saw a patient in the NICU who, even in the land of unbelievably tiny, critically ill infants, was doing exceptionally poorly.  She weighed around three pounds, required assistance to breathe, had severe hydrocephalus and a ventricular assist device to help shunt the excess fluid out of her skull.  She had already spent more than two months in the unit, and she was still two months away from her estimated due date had she made it to term.  She had been born via emergency C-section when her mother went into pre-term labor as a result of an infection at 22 weeks of pregnancy.  She had a twin sister that did not survive.

For reasons that aren’t entirely clear – perhaps unreliable dating of the pregnancy and therefore the infant’s gestational age, perhaps poor communication between the patient, the obstetricians, and the neonatologist – the neonatologist who was present at her birth believed that she was around 27 or 28 weeks’ gestational age.  She had to make a quick decision at the time of birth about whether or not to intubate the infant, and she says that even though her visual assessment of the girl was that she seemed terribly small, even for a 27-week preemie, she went ahead and intubated anyway.  She says now that she doesn't know if it was the right thing to do, that she had simply acted on the information she had at the time, and that she often regrets it when she passes by the isolette of this horribly fragile, tiny baby.

Babies born prematurely suffer more adverse health outcomes than term babies, and the more premature they are, the greater the number and severity of the complications they have, both in the short-term and the long-term.  Normally, the cutoff age for viability is 24 weeks’ gestation, and babies delivered at this age have a grim outlook – less than 50% even survive – but in this case, an infant even younger than that was kept alive when prevailing best medical practices would have dictated not to resuscitate such a premature baby.  The reasons behind these guidelines are numerous and range from the sheer probability that the child will live to the overwhelming health challenges they are guaranteed to have if they do.  Another, not at all insignificant factor, is the incredible amount of resources it takes to care for them after birth.  The daily average NICU stay exceeds $3,500 per infant, the average NICU stay costs $45,000, and it is not unusual for the total cost of an extended stay to exceed $1 million.  That is the kind of extended stay that Baby 22 Weeks is currently having here in an Atlanta hospital.  It is unclear at this point whether or not she will ever be well or strong enough to leave the NICU, and if she does, what quality of life she will be able to have.  Her mother won’t entertain any sort of conversation at all with her baby’s doctors about how to manage her case other than to “do everything possible”.  

~ ~ ~

No real deep thoughts here tonight.  It's test week, so I have neither the time nor the energy to do a whole lot of reflecting or writing.  I was just doing a quick little write-up for an upcoming ethics session we have during this last week of the peds rotation.  It is supposed to be about an ethical issue that we have witnessed during the rotation, and this is what I kept coming back to.  I am curious about people's thoughts.  I am not at all saying that this baby does not deserve to live, and I really hate the economic/financial expense argument when talking about the worth of a life.  I am in awe of what doctors are able to do, both before and after birth, to save the lives of infants with conditions that, until only very recently in history, would have had a 100% mortality rate.  I'm not even totally sure there is a real ethics issue here: the obstetricians tried to keep the mother's preterm labor at bay, the neonatologist acted to save the life of an infant she believed to be unquestionably viable, the mother wanted (and continues to want) everything possible to be done for a child that she loves.  Surely mistakes were made and surely this outcome was by no means unavoidable.  Maybe it's just the tragedy of the whole situation that gets to me.  Maybe it's just that, in a medical world with so much potential to do so much good, sometimes a lot of very smart people trying their best still get it wrong.  And maybe it's not the ethics of this case that gets to me.  Maybe it's that sometimes there are just no easy answers to be had.

Saturday, October 6, 2012

Tiny Babies

Oh, hey there, October!  Where on earth did YOU come from??!?

This is where I've been all week:


Nursery week!  

Mornings with the healthy babies on the Mother-Baby floor, and then afternoons with the teensy-tiny ones in the NICU.  It is all very adorable and prettttty great.  Especially because the healthy newborn exam is a snap and they are so freakin' cute, and they don't really let students touch the teeny sick ones and they are really freakin' cute too.  So in other words, I have not really done a whole lot this week other than make my ovaries want to explode.  

Why am I still awake right now??  Happy weekend, people.


Sunday, September 30, 2012

Bicycle Built for Two


Bicycle bicycle bicycle
I want to ride my bicycle bicycle bicycle

I want to ride my bicycle
I want to ride my bike
I want to ride my bicycle
I want to ride it where I like

-Queen, “Bicycle Race”

It won't be a stylish marriage --
I can't afford a carriage,
But you'd look sweet upon the seat
Of a bicycle built for two.

-Harry Dacre, "Daisy Bell (Bicycle Built for Two)"

~ ~ ~

In the world of hipsters and wannabes, wedding blogs and Pinterest, anyone who is between the ages of 20 and 40, or knows anyone between the ages of 20 and 40, will have already been familiar with the adorable image of a tandem bicycle on a wedding invitation (if you haven’t yet, don’t worry – it’s coming.)  However apt the image of a tandem bicycle might be for a new marriage or young love, in the unexpected setting of Parkinson’s disease, it makes an even more fitting, touching and literal symbol of not only love and devotion but even cutting edge medical promise, as well.

~ ~ ~

Parkinson’s Disease is a devastating neurological condition in which the afflicted slowly lose control over the movements of their body.  Slowness, tremors, deterioration of speaking ability and balance are some of the major manifestations of this disorder that affects an estimated 1 million Americans, and for which there is no cure.  In addition to problems with movement, people with PD also commonly suffer from depression, dementia, sexual difficulties and sleep disturbances.

PD is a progressive, degenerative nerve disorder that affects the neurons in the brain that control movement. The main neurons affected are located in the substantia nigra of the basal ganglia, which serve as the coordination center for signals coming from the cortex of the brain to the spinal cord in order to move muscles on command.  Their deterioration causes a deficiency of dopamine, a key chemical for proper brain function and the main neurotransmitter that they produce.  This is where the bicycles come in.

In the spring of 2010, Dr. Bastiaan Bloem of the Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center in the Netherlands was visited by a patient with advanced Parkinson’s.  This man had been afflicted with the condition for ten years, and he had been left nearly unable to walk at all, with a severe balance deficit, feet that repeatedly froze on the floor and a tremor that would cause him to fall after just a few shuffling steps.

This patient told his doctor that he could, however, still ride his bike perfectly – and was determined to prove it.  So doctor and patient went out to the parking lot, and with the help of a nurse to get him on the bike and shoved off, the patient rode off in perfect control, making a U-turn at the end of the parking lot and pedaling smoothly back, all Parkinson’s symptoms vanished.  The moment he brought the bike to a halt and stepped off, he froze immediately, unable to move his legs in a single step.  The episode was filmed and photographed, and the images were published in the April 1st, 2010 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.

Dr. Bloem – wheels turning, as it were – then asked 20 of his other patients severely affected by Parkinson’s disease if they could ride a bike.  It turned out that they all could. 

One explanation for the finding, according to Dr. Bloem, could be that bicycling uses a different part of the brain than walking – and that this part might not be so severely affected by Parkinson’s disease.  It could be, perhaps, that bicycling doesn’t require very much input from the part of the brain that’s diseased in Parkinson’s patients, the basal ganglia.  It’s the basal ganglia that processes signals for voluntary movements, and its impairment is the reason Parkinson’s patients freeze – the part of the brain that tells them what to do next isn’t functioning.  It’s certainly possible that one of the reasons the Dutch patient wasn’t showing any sign of Parkinson’s while riding a bike is that riding a bike doesn’t require a lot of signal processing in the basal ganglia.  Nurses helped the patient onto the bike and got him going, but once he was going, he could keep doing the same thing without much thought about motor strategies.  (Gives new significance to the old adage, “like riding a bike.”)

Another theory regarding the reason for this phenomenon is that it could be that the rhythmic pressure of the pedals on patients’ feet cues the nervous system to allow a cycling movement.  He suggests that the rotary motion of the pedals may provide an external pacing cue that keeps the Parkinson’s patients on track.  Given appropriate visual or emotional cues, people with Parkinson’s can dance, walk without freezing and perform complex movements for a few minutes at a time.  For example, there are many stories about patients with PD being caught in a building on fire and finding themselves able to run down stairs and escape safely, only to have symptoms return as soon as they got outside.  But this kinesia paradox, as it is known, does not last long, and is entirely different from being able to ride a bike flawlessly for miles at a time.  Until now, it was not known that patients with Parkinson’s could ride bikes.

In fact, the "bicycle sign" might help clinicians differentiate between the Parkinson’s disease and Parkinsonism of other disorders.  Patients with atypical Parkinsonism lose their ability to cycle during the early phase of the illness, while patients with Parkinson's disease continue to ride well.  This has important treatment implications because atypical Parkinsonism disorders can often look very similar to Parkinson's disease, but respond differently to therapy.  There is a legitimate question of whether or not the bicycle sign is universally applicable, given environmental and cultural differences between patients (Dr. Bloem and his patients reside in the the Netherlands, where absolutely everyone rides a bike.) 

~ ~ ~

While there are a number of useful medications that help ease Parkinson’s disease symptoms for a few hours, advancements in significant relief have eluded Parkinson’s researchers.  In a surprising and somewhat whimsical discovery, new evidence suggests that tandem cycling may bring a longer relief from the disease’s symptoms, with improvements lasting for weeks at a time.


The serendipitous discovery was made in 2003 when neuroscientist Jay Alberts, then a Parkinson’s disease researcher at Emory University in Atlanta, rode a tandem bike across the state of Iowa with his friend Cathy Frazier, a Parkinson’s patient.  The two were riding the staewide bicycle tour to raise awareness of the neurodegenerative disease, but they also found, much to both of their surprise, that her tremors disappeared after about an hour of riding.  She told him that she felt great while riding and that it was as if she didn’t have the disease.  They also noticed that her handwriting improved.  Patients with Parkinson’s often develop micrographia, meaning that their handwriting becomes small and illegible.  Alberts’ friend Cathy had noticed the progressive shrinking and illegibility of her handwriting as her PD progressed, but during this bike tour, she wrote on a birthday card with beautiful, large, legible letters.  It made Alberts take note.

Alberts wondered if this mysterious side effect of the tandem bike ride held an intriguing medical possibility: the improved motor control in the arms and hands even though only the legs were exercising seemed to suggest that there was some change taking place in the central nervous system that improved global motor function, perhaps by triggering the release of biochemical messengers.

Now a researcher at the Cleveland Clinic, Jay Alberts has conducted several studies with Parkinson’s patients inspired by these discoveries and his passion for biking.  Many patients are able to lower their medication dosages and regain motion in extremities.  Other patients have regained their sense of smell from bike riding, which is commonly lost in PD and often one of the first symptoms that patients notice before being diagnosed.

Dr. Alberts had volunteers with Parkinson’s ride a solo stationary bicycle at his or her own pace.  Most chose a pedaling cadence of around 60 revolutions per minute, a relatively non-strenuous level of exertion.  He then placed them on the back seat of a tandem bike that had been modified to ensure that the back rider would have to actively pedal; he or she could not just passively let the pedals turn.  On the tandem, the rider in front had been instructed to pedal at a cadence of about 90 RPM and with higher force output or wattage than the patients had produced on their own.  The result was that the riders in back had to pedal harder and faster than was comfortable for them.

Tandem bike riding has turned out to be beneficial therapy for patients, but Alberts determined it was because the exercise was forced.  The challenge of pedaling much faster than normal activates the part of the brain that controls body movements and releases dopamine, which is what improves symptoms in Parkinson's patients.  According to Alberts, the medications often given for symptom improvement in PD activate certain areas of the brain or increase the blood flow there, and an almost identical pattern of activation is seen in the brains of patients who have done forced exercise.

This is an exciting finding because it contrasts with some earlier results involving voluntary exercise and Parkinson’s patients.  In those experiments, the activity was helpful, but often in a limited, localized way.  Weight training, for instance, led to stronger muscles, and slow walking increased walking speed and endurance.  But such regimens typically did not improve Parkinson’s patients’ overall motor control.

The forced pedaling regimen, on the other hand, did lead to better full-body movement control, which prompted Dr. Alberts to conclude that the exercise must be affecting the riders’ brains as well as their muscles.  His theory that was substantiated when he used functional M.R.I. machines to see inside his volunteers’ skulls.  The scans showed that, compared with Parkinson’s patients who hadn’t ridden, the tandem cyclists’ brains were more active.

Dr. Alberts suspects that in Parkinson’s patients, the answer may be simple mathematics. More pedal strokes per minute cause more muscle contractions than fewer pedal strokes, which, in consequence, generate more nervous-system messages to the brain. There, he thinks, biochemical reactions occur in response to the messages, and the more messages, the greater the response.

This raises fascinating questions not only about whether exercise can help to combat the disease but also whether intense, essentially forced workouts affect brains differently than gentler activity does, even in those of us who are healthy.  In lab animals, forced and voluntary exercise can lead to different outcomes.  Mice and rats generally enjoy running, and they will voluntarily hop aboard and run on a wheel placed in their cages.  But if an animal is placed on a treadmill and the speed controlled so that it must keep pace, often with help from a finger prod or electrical shock, the activity becomes forced.

Interestingly, the effects in animals, especially on their brains, are typically more beneficial after forced exercise.  In one study from 2008, rats forced to run wound up with significantly more new brain cells after eight weeks than those who ran when they chose, even though the latter animals ran faster.  And in another experiment, mice that were required to exercise on treadmills subsequently performed better on cognitive tests than those given access to running wheels.

A small eight-week study was launched to gauge the effects of forced exercise in which the patients underwent hour-long sessions of forced riding, pedaling at 80-90 RPM.  And the results were impressive: there was a 35% improvement in motor functioning, significant lessening of tremors and better body control for the patients who did the forced exercise compared with those exercisers who pedaled a stationary bike at their own pace, and the improvement lasted for four weeks after the cycling sessions ended.

Whether forced exercise would similarly affect healthy brains is unknown at this point, he says, as is the question of whether riding on the back of a tandem behind a stronger cyclist is the only qualifying exercise.  It seems likely that intense exercise of any kind should produce comparable brain reactions.  There is even some data showing that people who exercise intensely have a lower risk of developing Parkinson’s and other neurological diseases. 

In addition to motor difficulties, individuals with Parkinson's disease often experience cognitive declines.  And although pharmacologic therapies are helpful in treating motor deficits in PD, they do not appear to be effective for cognitive complications.  While acute bouts of moderate aerobic exercise have been shown to improve cognitive function in healthy adults, individuals with PD often have difficulty with exercise, for obvious reasons.  Another recent study looked the effects of passive leg cycling on executive function in PD, which was assessed with two different tests before and after the cycling.  Volunteers showed significant improvements on the test after exercising, and the difference between times to complete the two exams significantly decreased from pre- and post-cycling times.  It is thought that the improved executive function after passive cycling may be the result of increases in cerebral blood flow, which correlates with theories regarding post-cycling motor function improvement as well, suggesting multiple benefits from forced exercise in patients with PD. 

Regardless, bicycling offers patients an opportunity to be symptom-free while they are riding, to look and feel normal, and to get some real cardiovascular exercise even when their disease is so far advanced that they cannot walk.  The humble tandem bike was one of the Top 10 Medical Innovations for 2010 at Cleveland Clinic.  Remember how awesome that is the next time a bride-to-be tells you how totally adorable she thinks it would be to exit her reception on one.  It could add just the perfect element of kitsch to her perfectly color-coordinated DIY wedding.  But it could also hold the key to someday saving lives.



Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...